The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) latest Market Watch 84 is more than a routine regulatory bulletin. It signals intensifying scrutiny of data quality, vendor oversight, change-management and omissions in derivative reporting.
If your firm is active in derivatives, trade reporting or UK European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) or the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) frameworks, this edition should be a wake-up call. A passive or reactive position towards the themes laid out in Market Watch can cause regulatory noncompliance or reputational risk.
Key Themes from Market Watch 84
- UK EMIR Refit
The FCA and Bank of England have upgraded the UK EMIR reporting regime to improve transparency and alignment with international standards. Although 95% of contract reports were enhanced to the new standards by the March 2025 deadline, a minority of counterparties continue to submit reports using the outdated schema, which is now non-compliant.
Takeaway: Firms must ensure full compliance with the UK EMIR Refit, including retrospective alignment of legacy trades. Partial adoption is not acceptable.
- Vendor Dependence
The bulletin notes that several counterparties failed to meet the reporting deadline due to overreliance on key individuals, underestimation of the implementation effort and dependency on vendors with limited capacity. In some cases, data mapping errors and schema inaccuracies from vendors were directly inherited by reporting firms.
Takeaway: Regulatory responsibility cannot be outsourced. Firms must independently validate vendor outputs and maintain oversight of delegated reporting.
- Errors and Omissions Management
The FCA has logged 267 error and omission breach notifications since the reporting refit. The regulator expresses concern that the volumes of notifications is lower than expected and suggests that this could be caused by underreporting.
Takeaway: If in doubt, report. The FCA expects transparency and encourages firms to notify even when the materiality of an error is uncertain. Proactivity now can reduce enforcement risks later.
- Reconciliation and Control Frameworks
Market Watch 84 emphasises the importance of robust reconciliation processes, accurate tracking of trade life cycles and correction of discrepancies between live and matured trades.
Takeaway: Data quality is non-negotiable. Weak reconciliation controls can create systemic vulnerabilities and trigger regulatory scrutiny.
Impacts on Strategy
- Regulatory Priority Shift: Firms familiar with FCA supervision will notice an intensification. The focus is moving from flexibility to standardised, process-based requirements. Poor documentation, vendor reliance and inconsistent reconciliation practices will prompt FCA investigation.
- Market Integrity Risk: EMIR data is not just for firm-level compliance, it underpins macroprudential oversight. Inaccurate data can distort the FCA’s view of systemic risk, potentially impacting the entire sector’s credibility.
- No Tolerance for Delays: As highlighted in previous bulletins, the FCA is increasingly intolerant of delayed remediation. Firms that defer upgrades or fail to escalate known issues may face significant consequences.
- Competitive Advantage: Firms that align early with the expectations in Market Watch 84 will strengthen their regulatory posture and build trust with stakeholders. Strong compliance is now a differentiator.
Action Plan for Market Watch 84 Compliance
Here is a phased, actionable plan to response to Market Watch 84:
| Phase | Objective | Key Actions |
| Phase 1: Diagnostics and Gap Assessments | Understand Current Position |
|
| Phase 2: Stabilise Core Controls | Formalise Key Operational Processes |
|
| Phase 3: Governance and Oversight | Build Strong Assurance |
|
| Phase 4: Ongoing Readiness | Anticipate Next Steps |
|
A Message to Senior Management
Regulatory compliance is no longer a siloed function, it is embedded in risk, operations and reputation management. Leadership must consider:
- What is the impact of a trade reporting failure on our firm?
- Do our contracts enable sufficient vendor oversight?
- How quickly can we respond to regulatory queries?
- Are we capturing and documenting remediation effectively?
Even minor failings can generate disproportionate regulatory or reputational fallout. A proactive stance is essential.
How can Complyport Help?
At Complyport, we translate regulatory expectations into operational resilience. In response to Market Watch 84, we offer:
- Compliance Monitoring and Assurance: Embedding ongoing EMIR/MiFiD reporting checks into your compliance monitoring plan, providing independent assurance reviews and Board-level reporting.
- Vendor Oversight Framework: Designing and implementing governance models that evidence oversight of delegated or third-party reporting, including SLA monitoring, due diligence and escalation processes.
- Change Management and Refit Readiness: Supporting firms though schema upgrades, system transitions and testing programmes to ensure continuity and compliance during regulatory change.
- Independent Compliance Assurance: Delivering periodic monitoring reviews, Board reporting and regulatory engagement support to evidence your firm’s proactive oversight and commitment too market integrity.
Book a meeting with one of our Subject Matter Experts today to explore how Complyport can help you strengthen your regulatory reporting and controls.
Ask ViCA, your Virtual Compliance Assistant. Claim your complimentary 20 queries today! Register here: https://vica.chat
