Obtaining an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) or Payment Institution (PI) authorisation involves more than submitting the required application forms and policies.

Your MLRO Training DayWith regulatory fines exceeding £600 million in the past two years due to failures in AML systems and controls, can you or your team ever be overtrained or too prepared on everything AML? Whether you are a recently appointed MLRO or someone looking for a refresher course, the London Governance & Compliance […]

The United Arab Emirates is experiencing rapid growth as a global financial technology and payments engine, propelled by initiatives from the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE), DFSA and FSRA. However, beneath this rapid expansion lies a increasingly complex regulatory environment. As supervisory scrutiny intensifies around stored value facilities, retail payment services, and cross-border money transmission, payment institutions and FinTech firms face critical operational and legal risks that can derail market access if left unaddressed.

For sales teams in high-value automotive retail, rigid compliance checks are often viewed as a roadblock during peak showroom hours. However, with supervisory authorities intensifying Anti-Money Laundering (AML) enforcement on luxury transactions, dealerships can no longer rely on lax onboarding.

Regulators across the UAE, including the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE), DFSA, FSRA, VARA and the Ministry of Economy, have significantly escalated their supervisory enforcement, issuing record fines, public censures and license suspensions. Many of these enforcement actions stem from recurring, systemic weaknesses within internal compliance and governance frameworks rather than intentional wrongdoing.

While many investment firms focus on the capital and liquidity outputs of the ICARA process, supervisory expectations increasingly focus on the underlying risk management framework that supports those outcomes.